Test for the most dangerous game

Indirect Characterization. Which of the following is an example of indirect characterization? Marcia was a good listener and wonderful friend. Marcia felt the knot in her stomach grow when she saw the number of questions on the test and she tugged her hair anxiously. Marcia was a nervous person. Marcia was an optimist who always believed the best about people.

Static Characters Which is the major conflict of the story? Rainsford is trying to return to the boat he fell off. General Zaroff and Rainsford argue over when hunting is an okay sport. General Zaroff is hunting Rainsford as sport. General Zaroff tries to hide the fact that he hunts and kills humans. What is the rising action? The beginning of the story, we learn about characters and setting. The most intense moment of the story. The ending of the story.

Events that add suspense and create more conflict, leading up to the climax. What is the final resolution in The Most Dangerous Game? Rainsford has the best night of sleep in his life.

Rainsford surprises General Zaroff in his room. General Zaroff challenges Rainsford to a hunt. Rainsford becomes one of the Avengers. In this element of plot the author introduces the characters and setting Rising Action.

The most dangerous game is a story of people who dare to go sailing into uncharted lands where most sailors dread and avoid. Whitney and his friend Rainsford are big-game hunters bound for a hunting trip in the Amazon River basin.

Take this test and see how much you know about the story of the most dangerous game by taking this test. The general is confident in his own abilities to hunt and kill, and therefore Rainsford will be dead. This attitude foreshadows events in which he learns that sailors know more than the average passenger.

Search Speak now. Questions All questions 5 questions 6 questions 7 questions 8 questions 9 questions 10 questions 11 questions 12 questions. Zaroff, Ivan, and one of Zaroff's dogs.

Zaroff, Ivan and captured sailors. What can we infer at the end of the story? Rainsford slept in Zaroff's bed and Zaroff had lost. Rainsford allowed Zaroff to live and Rainsford went home. Zaroff won the fight and Rainsford was fed to the dogs. Rainsford cares too much for the finer points of life. Which of the following statements best describes how Zaroff justifies his hunting of human beings? Animal life is more precious than human life.

Only the strong deserve to survive. Individual freedom is more important than laws. Human beings are not morally responsible for one another.

Which of the following statements is the best example of foreshadowing in the story? The fact that Rainsford smokes a pipe foreshadows his death. How does Rainsford finally escape from Zaroff? Rainsford jumps into the ocean and swims out to sea. Rainsford stabs Zaroff while out in the jungle. Rainsford tricks the dogs into attacking Zaroff. What do Rainsford's hunting skills tell him about the blood he examined in the jungle?

He thought he was in a safe place. He thought a large animal had been killed. That a man had been killed. He thought the animal escaped and was near by. Which of the following is an example of irony in the story? Zaroff says he is civilized but savagely hunts people. Rainsford refuses to go hunting with Zaroff. Rainsford swam to the shore with all his might. Ivan held a gun to Rainsford's face and said nothing.

How does Zaroff's appearance influence Rainsford's first impression of him? Rainsford is confused by the man's clothes.

This attempt to lose Zaroff is unsuccessful. How does Rainsford's opinion on animals change throughout the story? At first, Rainsford sees animals only as prizes for human hunters, but later Rainsford sympathizes with the animal "at bay" when he too becomes the hunted. The Most Dangerous Game study guide contains a biography of Richard Connell, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.

The Most Dangerous Game essays are academic essays for citation. These papers were written primarily by students and provide critical analysis of The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell.